could wizards beat people with guns in a firefight

(And, yes, a clarification can be incorrect, but until you have a particular reason to believe this to be true- such as conflicting clarifications from different authors- you have no reason not to take it at face value.) Yes, published clarifications are nice because they're visible to more readers and codified for future reference, and if you have a conflict between two clarifications the published one would be 'Official' and take precedence, but a clarification's publication or lack thereof doesn't change its relevance or veracity.

To be clear, it's not the same as errata, where the actual text is changing and thus must be done in an official context (mostly because it's a licensed product, and Lucas Licensing has contractual approval over anything published under that license). If this were not the case and it was not part of the same contracted job, then that would imply that Rodney would have to pay me for billable hours just to answer his personal questions about what a rule is supposed to mean! (Sure, I could use the money, but still.) contracted) with creating a publication, they're technically still performing that task if they have to clarify an ambiguous bit of that communication. The point of a publication is to communicate specific information thus, if someone is officially tasked (i.e. published- to tell you the correct interpretation of an ambiguous statement. Q1: If a game designer posts on these forums, should his word be taken as official errata?Ī: For the record, a clarification from a designer/developer/editor doesn't have to be 'Official'- i.e. Reference Book: Star Wars Saga Edition Web Enhancements They were compiled by RavingDork, who was not affiliated with WotC, and this section should be read with that in mind. This section compiles discussions between Rodney Thompson and users of the wizards forum about rulings in Saga Edition.

Could wizards beat people with guns in a firefight